The charge of class warfare has been thrown a few times during the protests, that the middle class is under attack. It started with the Budget Repair Bill that seeks to restrict the bargaining rights of public unions and increase pensions and health care payments, is an assault on the middle class, as it would reduce their income and ability to bargain in the workplace. Upon the release of Scott Walker's Budget Repair bill the accusations of class warfare increased. Education at all levels will see significant reductions, public transportation will be sharply cut, drastically decrease Local Government Aid (LGA) and curtail their ability to raise revenue, would cut Medicaid funding that could force 50,000 off of prescription plans, would relocate the authority for the state Medicaid funding to the state Department of Health which is headed by a man hostile to those programs, and would reduce state tax credits and rebates to the poor. At the same time he is cutting taxes to corporations and has pledged not to approve any tax increases.
Supporters of Walker use rhetoric like "sharing the burden" to justify this action, that everyone needs to share in the pain of a budget deficit. I do agree with that idea, but tax cuts to the wealthy and businesses and budget cuts often mean that the middle class and poor bear the burden, while the wealthy's burden is eased. I don't call that sharing the burden. In addition to spending cuts, 20,000 some public sector jobs will be lost, plus 1,500 to 6,000 more if Walker carries out his threat if the Senate Democrats don't return soon. With additional cuts to Medicaid and tax credits and rebates to the poor it will have an adverse effect on the poor and middle class by increasing their expenses and limiting their opportunities through education.
At the same time we are cutting spending, tax cuts are being given to businesses and he has taken tax increases off the table, with the idea that job creation will occur when the tax burden is eased. Why anyone uses this tactic after it has been proven time and time again to be ineffective is beyond me. It doesn't work and it reduces revenue which makes the state cut more spending. It seems to me that when faced with a budget crisis, that no option should be taken off the table and executives should be willing to use a balanced approach of potential tax increases on those who can afford and budget cuts, while protecting essential services. However, that approach is not being taken, nor considered. The Governor and state legislatures will most likely continue to seek to cut taxes and slash spending regardless of the impact that it has upon the poor and middle class.